Detectar vulnerabilidades en Go con gosec
gosec encontro 17 vulnerabilidades en una app Go escrita a proposito, cuatro por analisis de taint. La diferencia entre G204 y G702 explica por que ese analisis importa.
Tag archive
gosec encontro 17 vulnerabilidades en una app Go escrita a proposito, cuatro por analisis de taint. La diferencia entre G204 y G702 explica por que ese analisis importa.

In a well-known family of LLM evaluation bugs, the failure doesn't look like a failure. A judge model...
Today I started experimenting with Tree-sitter. I had heard the name before, but I had never...
Every heuristic in our static MCP manifest scanner, what each one actually checks, and an honest line...
So a month ago I posted an experiment here: can you link a React frontend to a .NET backend with...
CodeQL 2.26.3 reworks how the engine reasons about GitHub Actions workflows, tightening output-clobbering, cache-poisoning and env-var injection queries and removing the self-hosted runner module. Hosted code scanning is already on the new pack, so the next full run may move alert counts in both directions.
A Semgrep detector plus hand adjudication over 120 locally generated Python/TypeScript functions: syntax can surface 'silent failure' candidates, but the verdict lives outside the code.

Static analysis examines code without running it. Production reliability looks at what a change...
A security ruleset is judged by what it does not flag. Anyone can write a pattern that catches a...
Every security scanner has tests proving it catches things. Malicious sample in, finding out, green...
Almost half of data leaks come from compromised AI tools. Discover practical steps to harden your CI/CD pipeline against hidden malware and supply chain attacks
An agent uses whatever it finds in scope. In Go, unexported reaches every file in the package, so the boundary you meant to keep lives only in somebody's head. declscope checks it deterministically, with the package still flat.