Tag archive
Sponsor prizes for 'best use of X API' create a real conflict-of-interest question for judges. How to keep sponsor-track judging fair and clearly sepa
Face and vision models trained on unbalanced datasets perform unevenly across skin tones. What to test for, deliberately, before trusting a model in p
HY3 (free) beats Nemotron 3 Ultra (free) on lforla's Bias Stereotypes A/B fairness benchmark, 82.9 vs 81.7. Axis-by-axis breakdown of why, what the gaps mean in practice, and how to choose a model.
A solo participant is competing against teams of three or four with more hands and hours. Should the rubric adjust for that, and if so, how?
Occasionally a team disagrees, sometimes loudly, with a judge's score. How to respond in a way that protects both the team's dignity and the process's
A coin flip or an organiser's gut call at the top of the leaderboard erodes trust fast. A tie-breaking process decided before the event, not during it
A judge who mentored a team, taught them, or knows them personally has a real conflict. How I've seen it handled well, and what organisers should ask
Introduction: The Silent Erosion of SOC Team Cohesion In the high-pressure domain of...
Introduction Imagine this: you’re in your first Over-the-Board (OTB) chess tournament,...
Introduction In the high-stakes world of UFC, where careers are made and broken in the...
Originally published at han-co.com · Part of the "Basics" strand of my Credit & Finance Data...
Introduction: A Tackle, a Fracture, and a Rule That Shifts the Goalposts Brazilian...